The Horizons of Education 2050 project was conceived as a collective construction process, where thinking about the future also meant listening to the present in multiple voices. The diversity of engagement formats reflects this intention: to create complementary spaces for dialogue, analysis, and imagination.
Quick, focused meetings organized around strategic themes. In these meetings, groups of participants explored tensions, trends, and emerging possibilities, co-constructing hypotheses and identifying areas of opportunity.
A Blitz Session was conducted with the students, considered "the most important people in the education system," for dialogue about the future.
Students express unease with the current focus on memorization in order to "dump the material" on tests. They advocate for a future with greater freedom to choose what they learn, building more individualized learning paths.
Assessment should move away from rote memorization and focus on practical application (suggesting the use of VR). AI is seen as a tool for personalizing learning, but also as a warning that traditional forms of assessment are becoming obsolete.
The future of education should focus on human values and the development of soft skills such as empathy.
They view positively the emergence of mentoring projects among students of different ages and the greater ease in prototyping ideas in school projects.
They reject the passivity of the 50-minute class. They demand more interactive methodologies and the integration of professionals from the job market into the teaching staff. The physical space should be more human and less like a "hospital or company-type" environment.
The desired impact on the education of the future was summarized in the words Transform and Enhance.
The Blitz Session brought together key players from the Portuguese education ecosystem – including teachers, principals, pedagogical managers, and experts in innovation and community development – to reflect on the structural forces that will shape the education sector by 2050.
The school needs to break free from the status quo and purely union or labor interests, in order to focus on educational interests.
Education is not about buildings, but about people. The space must be safe and welcoming. It is essential that decisions involve the community and that "very high expectations and great rigor" are maintained.
The school of the future is envisioned as a "community center," integrated with businesses, artists, and organizations. The spaces should be bright, green, and open, without the current fixed blocks and cycles.
The school is a "mirror of society," and a regression in democratic values could lead to a future where schools revert to having "rows of desks.".
Teaching should be hands-on through small projects, rather than simply transmitting knowledge. The school should be a "talent incubator" with individual learning paths.
Teachers are "very alone." It is crucial to strengthen their role and promote collaboration and the collective sharing of experiences, so that pedagogical decisions are not dominated solely by politicians.
One positive sign at present is curricular autonomy and the possibility of creating innovation plans, which allows schools to build a unique identity.
The future implies a tension between freedom and the need for regulation to prevent the unregulated system from leaving too many people behind (mentioning the example of mobile phones in schools).
The desired impact on the education of the future was summarized in the words To liberate and empower.
11 interviews
All respondents consider Generative AI a "total revolution" or "disruption." There is a consensus that AI should be embraced for the personalization of education and to reduce teaching bureaucracy.
There is a deep cultural/generational gap between teachers and students. Students are more anxious and seek immediate gratification. The teacher must evolve from a transmitter of content to a facilitator, inspirer, and manager of experiences.
The "degree for life" model is over. The future demands a reconfiguration of education into shorter, more flexible units (modules, micro-credentials). Universities must transform themselves into hubs of lifelong learning or "account managers" for the student's journey.
Skills such as critical thinking, creativity, autonomy, and the ability to ask good questions are considered more important than simply memorizing answers. There is a pedagogical deficit in teacher training to integrate these skills into the core curriculum.
Rigid governance, accreditation systems, and bureaucracy hinder adaptation and innovation in public institutions. Alternative models (such as School 42) and mechanisms for private agility within universities emerge as a response.
Longevity and demographic decline are important structural forces. Education must actively integrate the topic of mental health (not only through consultations, but also through social integration environments such as sports and culture).
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is widely recognized as a "total revolution".
The traditional model of a "lifelong degree" is outdated.
Tension between the conservative model vs. active involvement in the learning process.
The future demands that education focus on the holistic development of citizens.
Higher Education Institutions / Schools
NGO
Enterprise
Public administration
Stakeholders note that AI will transform services, learning, and governance, promising greater efficiency and personalization, but warn of the risks of data dependency.
Many participants emphasize the need for citizens to be able to learn throughout their lives, through modular micro-credentials that recognize skills and facilitate mobility.
There is a widespread perception that teachers will evolve into mentors and facilitators, requiring new, diversified career paths supported by pedagogical teams and micro-credentials.
This area is seen as critical because it emphasizes the importance of data, AI, critical thinking, creativity, and socio-emotional skills in active learning methodologies.
This is a highly relevant topic, perceived as putting pressure on higher education to diversify its audiences and expand lifelong learning.
A significant number of stakeholders consider emotional well-being a prerequisite for learning, requiring institutional support, mentoring, and integrated services.